Definitions of tuning terms
© 1998 by Joseph L. Monzo
All definitions by Joe Monzo unless otherwise cited
German musical nomenclature
(This is a detailed analysis of a discussion in
my HEWM notation definition. Here I use the vector notation which is
explained on that page.)
Where we use positive and negative integers (including zero)
to represent the exponents of
prime-factor
3 in a Pythagorean tuning system
-- and assuming it to be
"8ve"-equivalent
so that it describes pitch-classes
rather than specific pitches,
and we can ignore prime-factor 2 --
this is how the standard Pythagorean tuning
is notated (as an incipient "cycle of 5ths"):
German musical nomenclature is quite unorthodox in including
the 8th letter, H, for [2], so that B stands for [-5], and
the b symbol is used with all 6 of the other letters but
not with the letter B, as portrayed
on this lattice diagram:
This has the effect of destroying the regularity
of the application of letter-names to the diatonic
scale steps as in the standard system in the
first lattice.
The association of the L and s
step-sizes with the progression of letters is as follows:
The shifting of position of B from [+2] to [-5]
merely alters the arrangement, without changing
the basic patter of L and s.
But note that the progression from G to H is a
Pythagorean
interval
called the ditone,
the equivalent of a "major 3rd".
Then the progression from H
back to the first letter A, is -L, that is, a
"whole-tone" downward.
Examination must also be made of the relationship
of these letters to their neighbors in the scale,
that is, in terms of pitch-height.
In fact, this nomenclature arose as a result of the
standard medieval scale containing both a B and a Bb
in the "8ve" below "middle-C", which in turn was
a holdover from ancient Greek theory. The Greek
"Greater and Lesser Perfect System"
contained both diezeugmenon (disjunct)
and synemmenon (conjunct)
tetrachords, which, if we
call the reference note mese by the letter A,
contained respectively the notes B (paramese)
and Bb (trite synemmenon) below "middle-C".
(See my
Tutorial
on ancient Greek tetrachord-theory for a detailed
explanation.)
The tetrachords were all assumed to have the
same intervallic structure, ascending
tone - tone -
semitone.
Here is the central "8ve" of the Greek system
in both types of nomenclature, with proportional
spacing to show tones and
semitones:
The German nomenclature merely sought to give
each pitch-class that ocurred in the system a unique name.
Later, when the letter b was employed to effect
mutation into other,
more distant tetrachords
(or hexachords),
the German nomenclature was never modified to
accomodate it, and its use as a flat sign was
simply extended to the other 6 letters while
retaining the H/B distinction for what everyone
else calls B/Bb.
Much is often made of the fact the these four
letters spell the last name of the great German
composer Johann Sebastian Bach, and Bach himself
created musical motifs from these four notes to
spell his name, most notably in the motive which
permeates his Die Kunst der Füge [The Art of Fugue]:
I used the generic interval symbols
m2 for "minor 2nd"
and m3 for "minor 3rd"
here instead of the specific Pythagorean ones, because
by Bach's time meantone
-- which completely reverses the effect of the
diatonic and
chromatic
semitones, making the
flats higher than the sharps --
had already been firmly established
as the standard tuning for over a century,
and Bach himself was helping to establish the
well-temperaments
(such as Werkmeister's) which would
dominate European tuning for about the next century,
until the preeminence of 12edo
beginning around 1900. Examples of musical motifs
spelling B-A-C-H in 12edo tuning can be found in scores
by Schoenberg, Berg, and Webern.
German writings about music still use this
nomenclature today, so it is applicable to all
of the tunings I discuss here.
This confusion of meaning for the letter B
(for the note Bb in German but B in all other
languages) is the cause for a serious typographical
error in the English translation of Schoenberg's
Harmonielehre.
[from Joe Monzo, JustMusic: A New Harmony]
Eb Bb F C G D A E B F#
etc. ... -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 ... etc.
Eb B F C G D A E H F#
etc. ... -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 ... etc.
standard nomenclature
A B C D E F G (A)
2 -5 2 2 -5 2 2
L s L L s L L
German nomenclature
A B C D E F G H (A)
-5 2 2 2 -5 2 4 -2
s L L L s L M3 -L
standard nomenclature
meson synemmenon
__________ ____________
| \/ |
A Bb C D
E F G A B C D E
\/ |____________|
tone diezeugmenon
of
disjunction
German nomenclature
meson synemmenon
__________ ____________
| \/ |
A B C D
E F G A H C D E
\/ |____________|
tone diezeugmenon
of
disjunction
standard nomenclature
A Bb B C
-5 7 -5
German nomenclature
A B H C
-5 7 -5
In a private communication of February 22, 2002, Daniel Wolf noted:
I had a glance had your pages this PM and -- amid many nice things -- wandered over to your page on German note names. The presentation doesn't quite work for me, for two reasons:(1) the characterization of "German" notation as "unorthodox". This is far from the case, as both common note naming systems stem from a common tradition, but branch off into two significant streams. I find it hard to consider the Lowlands-German-Eastern Europe branch as any bit less "orthodox" than the Anglo-Latin branch; in fact, you could make the far better case for the former being the leading branch, based on the repertoire represented and on the fact that in Latin countries, Solfege syllables are more important than letter names.
(2) you don't bring across the essential notion of hard and soft "b's", one of which has survived as a lower-case h (because of the similar squared shape). This is critical in the history of pitch notation, especially in the 14th and 15th centuries, when (a) a given voice in a composition was notated in terms of either the collection with the hard b or the collection with the soft b, and (b) the choice of hexachords used in performing a given piece were determined by the hard/soft question. Because of the equal weight given to both collections (and leaving aside the fact that the notation using a letter "h" instead of the squared "b" would only be introduced later), it is impossible to say that the collection "without accidentals" was either the one with the soft b or the one with the hard b. And, if you think of it a bit, it has no relevancy to the relationship of the accidentals to the pythagorean sequence of fifths whether one starts the sequence on Bb/b or ends it on B/h.
I personally use English note names, but I can't see the path that leads to the b/h notation as anything other than an equally legitimate one to ours, even if one which reflects a slightly different view of a common tradition and seems, superficially, to lack our logic.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . see also
HEWM notation
(to download a zip file of the entire Dictionary, click here)
For many more diagrams and explanations of historical tunings, see my book. If you don't understand my theory or the terms I've used, start here
I welcome feedback about this webpage:
corrections, improvements, good links.
Let me know if you don't understand something.
return to the Microtonal Dictionary index
return to my home page
return to the Sonic Arts home page