Definitions of tuning terms
© 1998 by Joseph L. Monzo
All definitions by Joe Monzo unless otherwise cited
1/4-comma meantone
The most frequently encountered version of
meantone tuning, and
the only one in which the
"whole-tone"
is exactly the mean between the two commonly encountered
"whole-tones" in just-intonation.
1/4-comma meantone
is historically very important to the development of Western
music, as the paradigms postulated by "common-practice"
music-theory to a great extent depend on the elimination
or tempering-out of the
syntonic comma, which is probably
the most prominent feature of all meantones.
Note that while in the familiar 12edo (which also
belongs to the meantone family) there is
a complete set of enharmonic equivalents,
such that all 7 notes which have "flats" can also be "spelled"
as 7 different notes which have "sharps", in all other meantones
the "flats" are higher in pitch than supposedly enharmonically-equivalent
"sharps", which is the opposite of the case in the much older
Pythagorean tuning,
and also the opposite of the case in the "expressive intonation"
which has been widely taught in Eurocentric schools of playing
since Beethoven's time (around 1800).
Based on my research, I would say that
1/4-comma meantone
was the closest thing to a "standard" tuning in most of Europe from
approximately 1500 to 1700, and was still commonly found
on keyboards (especially organs) until about 1850.
It would probably be fair to say that most instrumental
music of the Renaissance and Baroque periods was intended
to be played in 1/4-comma
meantone or a close relative, and even after the growth in popularity of
well-temperaments
for keyboards after 1700, some form of meantone (generally
more like 1/6-comma or 55edo) was usually
still intended for orchestral music.
During Mozart's lifetime
(late 1700s) orchestral players began using an "expressive
intonation" which veered back towards Pythagorean, and
Beethoven's musical language certainly encouraged the
spread of 12edo,
but to some extent meantone persisted
in orchestral playing until approximately around the
time of Wagner (mid-to-late 1800s). After the nearly universal
adoption of 12edo,
the loss of meantone was lamented by Mahler in the early 1900s.
(see my webpage
A
Century of New Music in Vienna.)
= ~5.376572399 cents = ~5 & 3/8 cents
This has the effect of
tempering out the
syntonic comma so
that it vanishes, thus making 4 "5ths" minus 2 "8ves"
exactly equal to the
just
"major 3rd":
Assuming "octave"-equivalence
(i.e., the exponents of 2 are irrelevant to the construction of the
scale, so i've added 2-1 to the
vector here to put
the note into the reference "octave"),
the next note in the cycle after the "5th", that of
+2 generators,
is the "whole-tone"
2(-1)5(2/4) = ~193.1568569
cents. If we compare
this to the two JI
"whole-tones", subtracting the meantone from the larger
Pythagorean 9/8
and subtracting the smaller
5-limit 10/9
from the meantone, we find that it is indeed the exact
logarithmic mean between them:
Using vector addition again to compare the 1/4-comma meantone "5th"
with the 31-EDO "5th", we get a difference between the two of:
(A Microsoft Excel spreadsheet showing all the
calculations and the method used by Huygens is
here.)
The 7-tone diatonic scale in 1/4-comma meantone contains
only two "step" sizes: the ~193.1568569-cent "whole-tone"
described above, between C:D, D:E, F:G, G:A, and A:B,
and the ~117.1078577-cent "diatonic semitone" between E:F
and B:C:
Introducing "Bb" into the scale causes a new between-degree
interval to appear: the ~76.04899926-cent "chromatic semitone"
between Bb:B :
Continuing to add pitches at either end of
the chain, we eventually come to the "typical"
12-tone chromatic scale used in Europe during
the meantone era, from Eb to G#. This scale
has as between-degree intervals only the two
sizes of semitones, chromatic and diatonic:
Adding one more note to either end results in
another new between-degree interval, of
~41.05885841 cents, as between G#:Ab in my example here:
It was fairly common during the 1600s and 1700s
to find keyboards which had "split keys", so that
"black keys" were actually pairs of keys giving
both flats and sharps, which are separated by a diesis:
One may continue to add many more notes in this manner
without encountering a new step-size; thus, the 19-tone
chain of 1/4-comma meantone has between-degree intervals
of ~41.05885841 and ~76.04899926 cents:
If one continues to add notes, eventually at the 31st note there
will occur another smaller interval, as described below.
Extend the chain, for example, to 14 pitches on the "flat"
side of the origin and 17 on the "sharp" side, so that the
-14th generator = "Cbb" and +17th generator = "Ax" :
This is the 1/4-comma meantone interval of
enharmonicity:
in the example here, I assumed as system of -13 ...+17,
and have added the -14th generator
(it doesn't matter to which side, positive or negative,
the extra generator is added -- the result is the same).
Thus, 218 * 5-(31/4) acts
as a unison-vector which is not
tempered out in 1/4-comma meantone, and it acts as a unison-vector
which is tempered out in 31edo.
Below is a graph showing the pitch-height of this 32-tone chain
of 1/4-comma meantone. The red line connects the two pitches which
are close together.
Exponents
of 3 run across the top row and exponents of 5 run in a
column down the left side; C n0 is outlined
in heavy black;
syntonic-comma
equivalents (which have the same spelling) are in a
light shade of grey;
enharmonically
equivalent pitches (which have a different spelling
but are the same pitch as those in the central block)
are in a darker shade of grey.
Integers designate
the degrees of 31edo.
Meantone tunings can be and have been extended to as many notes
per 'octave' as desired, but when used
for fretted strings or, especially, keyboards, they are usually
limited to 12 discrete pitches per 'octave'.
Regardless of how many notes the meantone has, comparing any
two notes which are inclusively 12 steps apart in the
chain of "5ths" results in a
'wolf 5th' and its
complementary
'wolf 4th',
as can be seen in the following two tables. The 'wolves'
occur between the '5th'/'4th' complementary pair
which bound the
notes at the end of the series of 12 '5ths'.
In the tables below, the reference pitch
(1/1) is 'A', and the series of '5ths'
runs arbitrarily from 3-6 (= 'Eb') to
35 (= G#). The first table is an
interval matrix
of all possible intervals between any two pitches in this tuning.
The second table lists all available intervals and
the notes between which they can be found.
This is the most common mapping of meantone to a set of 12
pitch-classes,
extending from Eb on the flat side to G# on the sharp side.
It can be seen that a 12-tone subset of meantone
contains at least one instance
of all intervals from -11 to +11 generators.
Use of certain meantone chords may have been the result
of their resemblance to certain basic JI sonorities,
for example, the "augmented-6th" (+10 generators) is
a close approximation of the 7th
harmonic
(7:4 ratio).
Below is a table and graph showing how closely the intervals
in the 12-tone subset of 1/4-comma meantone given above
approximate JI chord
identities.
Below is a table and graph showing how closely a 31-tone
set of 1/4-comma meantone approximates
JI chord
identities.
Here is a graph comparing 1/4-comma meantone with
Werckmeister III tuning:
in
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning/message/8553
Margo Schulter writes:
'Aaron, writing an introduction to music in Italian (_Toscanello_ is a
title honoring his native Tuscany), advises the not necessarily
experienced reader to start by making the octave C-C "just," and then
the major third C-E "sonorous and just, as united as possible." While
Aaron does not specify a pure 5:4 for the major third, this seems to
me a natural reading of "sonorous and just." Then the fifths C-G-D-A-E
are tuned so that each is slightly "flat" or "lacking," and each by
the same amount. For example, A should be the same "distance" from D
as from E -- in other words, the fifths D-A and A-E should be tempered
from "perfection" by the same quantity.
As far as I'm concerned, this is enough to justify listing Aaron's
instructions as a description the procedure for obtaining 1/4-comma
meantone -- as various authors have done, and
Paul does in his table.
Further, Aaron adds after his C-G-D-A-E series of fifths that F should
be tuned by a similar but opposite procedure, making F in the fifth
F-C "a little high, passing a bit beyond perfection." If one assumes
symmetry, then 1/4-comma meantone indeed results.
Correctly pointing out that Aaron's instructions do not give a
mathematical description of 1/4-comma meantone, or explicitly direct
that all major thirds be made pure, Lindley raises the question of
what Aaron means by his statement that "thirds and sixths are blunted
or diminished" in this temperament.
One interpretation which occurs to me is that Aaron is comparing
meantone _major_ thirds and sixths with the same intervals in a
Pythagorean tuning with pure fifths -- where they are indeed somewhat
larger. Lindley emphasizes such ambiguous statements to argue that
Aaron's instructions do specify 1/4-comma for the first notes
C-G-D-A-E, but might lend themselves to various slightly irregular
tunings for the other fifths and thirds.
Another point made by Lindley is that Aaron uses the adjective
_giusta_ ("just") to refer not only to his initial octave and major
third (where "pure" is an attractive reading), but also for the
temperament as a whole -- _participatione & acordo giusto & buono_, "a
just and good temperament and tuning." However, Lindley himself is
ready to accept Aaron's opening C-G-D-A-E with its "sonorous and just"
major third C-E as a description of 1/4-comma. His statement about the
octave C-C and major third C-E being as sonorous or "united" as
possible would support this conclusion even we assume that "just" may
mean simply "euphonious" or "pleasing."
In his instructions for the final stage of the temperament, the tuning
of the sharps, Aaron directs that C#, tuned in relation to the fifth
A-E, should be a major third from A and a minor third from E, and
likewise with F# in relation to the fifth D-A, etc.
From one viewpoint, this language may simply be reminding the student
of the locations of major and minor thirds involving accidentals.
Lindley, however, pursuing his argument that a regular 1/4-comma
temperament is not _necessarily_ implied, argues that one _could_ read
this language to suggest something like Zarlino's 2/7-comma meantone
for the temperament of the sharps, with major and minor thirds
compromised by about the same amount from pure.
In arguing that Aaron's tuning is not _necessarily_ a regular
1/4-comma meantone, Lindley may have two motivations. First, he wishes
to emphasize that Aaron's instructions are not mathematically precise;
and indeed, I would agree that Zarlino (1571) and Salinas (1577) may
be the first known theorists to give such mathematical definitions of
1/4-comma and other meantone temperaments.
Secondly, Lindley wants to correct the view that 1/4-comma was a
universal standard in the 16th century. Since Aaron's instructions are
often taken as the paradigm case of this tuning, showing that they are
actually open to more than one interpretation would fit with his
larger campaign against "1/4-comma hegemony."
However, I find it noteworthy that without invoking any complex
mathematical concepts or even defining a syntonic comma, Aaron has
described in what I find beautiful as well as musicianly terms the
idea of tuning a pure major third and then dividing it into four
equally tempered fifths. Aaron's remaining instructions, including his
suggestion of a similar but opposite tempering of fifths in the flat
direction (F-C, and then Bb-F and Eb-Bb), permit a regular 1/4-comma
temperament, even if they do not compel it or define it in
mathematical terms.
If I were making
a table like Paul's,
I might list Aaron for 1/4-comma
and add a footnote or annotation like this:
"Aaron evidently describes a temperament with a pure major third C-E
and equally narrowed fifths for his first five notes C-G-D-A-E, with
further instructions permitting but not explicitly specifying that
other major thirds are pure; Zarlino (1571) and Salinas (1577) give
mathematically precise descriptions of a regular 1/4-comma tuning."'
Updated:
(to download a zip file of the entire Dictionary,
click here)
1/4-comma meantone
tuning narrows each
'5th' in a series of '5ths'
by 1/4 of a
syntonic comma,
hence its name.
This results in 'perfect 5ths' of approximately 697
cents or 6.97
Semitones. Ascending "5ths"
will be flatter than just,
and descending "5ths" will be sharper.
The amount of tempering in 1/4-comma meantone is:
(81/80)(1/4) = (2-4 * 34 * 5-1)(1/4) = 2-1 * 31 * 5(-1/4)
So the 1/4-comma meantone "5th" -- the
generator --
is (3/2) / ((81/80)(1/4)). Using
vector addition,
that's:
2^ 3^ 5^
| -1 1 0 | = 3/2
- | -1 1 -1/4 | = (2-4345-1)(1/4) = (81/80)(1/4)
-----------------------
| 0 0 1/4 | = 1/4-comma meantone "5th"
= ~696.5784285 cents.
2^ 3^ 5^
| 0 0 4/4 | = 4 meantone "5ths"
- | 2 0 0 | = 2 "8ves"
-----------------------
| -2 0 1 | = just "major 3rd" = 5/4 = ~386.3137139 cents.
2^ 3^ 5^
| -3 2 0 | = 9/8
- | -1 0 2/4 | = meantone
-----------------------
| -2 2 -2/4 | = ~10.7531448 cents.
2^ 3^ 5^
| -1 0 2/4 | = meantone
- | 1 -2 1 | = 10/9
-----------------------
| -2 2 -2/4 | = ~10.7531448 cents.
It was noted in 1691 by
Christiaan Huygens (and again
in the 1940s by Adriaan Fokker) that
31-EDO
was audibly indistinguishable from 1/4-comma meantone.
2(18/31) = 696.7741935 cents.
2^ 3^ 5^
| 18/31 0 0 | = 31-EDO "5th"
- | 0 0 1/4 | = 1/4-comma meantone "5th"
-------------------------
| 18/31 0 -1/4 | = 31-EDO "5th" "-" 1/4-comma meantone "5th"
= ~0.195765082 cent = ~1/5 cent
= approximately the superparticular ratio 8844:8843
= as Huygens noted, about 1/110 syntonic comma
= almost exactly 1/10 grad or 6 tuning units.
generator 8ves 5 ~cents
-1 1 * [-1/4] 503.4215715 "F"
4 - -2 * [ 4/4] 386.3137139 "E"
---------------------------
-5 3 * [-5/4] 117.1078577 1/4-comma meantone diatonic semitone ("minor-2nd")
generator 8ves 5 ~cents
5 -2 * [ 5/4] 1082.892142 "B"
-2 - 2 * [-2/4] 1006.843143 "Bb"
---------------------------
7 -4 * [ 7/4] 76.04899926 1/4-comma meantone chromatic semitone ("augmented prime")
generator 8ves 5 ~cents
-4 3 * [ -4/4] 813.6862861 "Ab"
8 - -4 * [ 8/4] 772.6274277 "G#"
---------------------------
-12 7 * [-12/4] 41.05885841 2/7-comma meantone "great" (enharmonic) diesis ("diminished-2nd")
generator 8ves 5 ~cents
-14 9 * [-14/4] 1047.902001 "Cbb"
17 - -9 * [ 17/4] 1041.833284 "Ax"
------------------------------
-31 18 * [-31/4] 6.068717548 (= ~6 1/15 cents) = 1/4-comma meantone "quadruply-diminished 3rd"
6.068717548 / 31 = 0.195765082 cents --> compare with above: this is the amount each
1/4-comma meantone generator must be tempered in order to acheive 31edo.
Below is a 2-dimensional
5-limit
bingo-card
lattice-diagram,
showing the
periodicity
of the 31edo representations of 5-limit
ratios,
with a typical spelling in a
chain from
Gbb at -13
generators
to Ax at +17 generators where C=n0
-- there is hardly any music in the
"common-practice (c. 1600-1900) repertoire which has
notes falling outside this range.
For more commentary on 1/4-comma meantone and
31-EDO, see
(Wed Nov 7, 2001 6:49 pm,
Subject: Re: 31-EDO and 1/4-comma meantone compared).
interval sizes given in Semitones
'3x' indicates the implied '5th' in the
'cycle of 5ths', not the actual tuning
G#
G
F#
F
E
Eb
D
C#
C
B
Bb
A
3x
5
-2
3
-4
1
-6
-1
4
-3
2
-5
0
G#
5
0.00
11.24
10.07
9.31
8.14
7.38
6.21
5.03
4.27
3.10
2.34
1.17
G
-2
0.76
0.00
10.83
10.07
8.90
8.14
6.97
5.79
5.03
3.86
3.10
1.93
F#
3
1.93
1.17
0.00
11.24
10.07
9.31
8.14
6.97
6.21
5.03
4.27
3.10
F
-4
2.69
1.93
0.76
0.00
10.83
10.07
8.90
7.73
6.97
5.79
5.03
3.86
E
1
3.86
3.10
1.93
1.17
0.00
11.24
10.07
8.90
8.14
6.97
6.21
5.03
Eb
-6
4.62
3.86
2.69
1.93
0.76
0.00
10.83
9.66
8.90
7.73
6.97
5.79
D
-1
5.79
5.03
3.86
3.10
1.93
1.17
0.00
10.83
10.07
8.90
8.14
6.97
C#
4
6.97
6.21
5.03
4.27
3.10
2.34
1.17
0.00
11.24
10.07
9.31
8.14
C
-3
7.73
6.97
5.79
5.03
3.86
3.10
1.93
0.76
0.00
10.83
10.07
8.90
B
2
8.90
8.14
6.97
6.21
5.03
4.27
3.10
1.93
1.17
0.00
11.24
10.07
Bb
-5
9.66
8.90
7.73
6.97
5.79
5.03
3.86
2.69
1.93
0.76
0.00
10.83
A
0
10.83
10.07
8.90
8.14
6.97
6.21
5.03
3.86
3.10
1.93
1.17
0.00
List of Intervals of 12-tone 1/4-comma meantone
(same mapping as that used above)
interval
generators
Semitones
31edo degrees
instances
diminished 8ve
-7
11.24
29
G#:G
F#:F
E:Eb
C#:C
B:Bb
major 7th
+5
10.83
28
G:F#
F:E
Eb:D
D:C#
C:B
Bb:A
A:G#
minor 7th
-2
10.07
26
G#:F#
G:F
F#:E
F:Eb
E:D
D:C
C#:B
C:Bb
B:A
A:G
augmented 6th
+10
9.66
25
Eb:C#
Bb:G#
diminshed 7th
-9
9.31
24
G#:F
F#:Eb
C#:Bb
major 6th
+3
8.90
23
G:E
F:D
E:C#
Eb:C
D:B
C:A
B:G#
Bb:G
A:F#
minor 6th
-4
8.14
21
G#:E
G:Eb
F#:D
E:C
D:B
C#:A
B:G
A:F
augmented 5th
+8
7.73
20
F:C#
Eb:B
C:G#
Bb:F#
wolf 5th
-11
7.38
19
G#:Eb
'perfect' 5th
+1
6.97
18
G:D
F#:C#
F:C
E:B
Eb:Bb
D:A
C#:G#
C:G
B:F#
Bb:F
A:E
diminished 5th
-6
6.21
16
G#:D
F#:C
E:Bb
C#:G
B:F
A:Eb
augmented 4th
+6
5.79
15
G:C#
F:B
Eb:A
D:G#
C:F#
Bb:E
'perfect' 4th
-1
5.03
13
G#:C#
G:C
F#:B
F:Bb
E:A
D:G
C#:F#
C:F
B:E
Bb:Eb
A:D
wolf 4th
+11
4.62
12
Eb:G#
diminished 4th
-8
4.27
11
G#:C
F#:Bb
C#:F
B:Eb
major 3rd
+4
3.86
10
G:B
F:A
E:G#
Eb:G
D:F#
C:E
Bb:D
A:C#
minor 3rd
-3
3.10
8
G#:B
G:Bb
F#:A
E:G
D:F
C#:E
C:Eb
B:D
A:C
augmented 2nd
+9
2.69
7
F:G#
Eb:F#
Bb:C#
diminished 3rd
-10
2.34
6
G#:Bb
C#:Eb
major 2nd
+2
1.93
5
G:A
F#:G#
F:G
E:F#
Eb:F
D:E
C:D
B:C#
Bb:C
A:B
minor 2nd
-5
1.17
3
G#:A
F#:G
E:F
D:Eb
C#:D
B:C
A:Bb
augmented unison
+7
0.76
2
G:G#
F:F#
Eb:E
C:C#
Bb:B
unison / 8ve
0
0 or 12
0
G#:G#
G:G
F#:F#
F:F
E:E
Eb:Eb
D:D
C#:C#
C:C
B:B
Bb:Bb
A:A
2003.03.30 -- added pitch-height graphs showing expansion to 32-tone chain
2003.03.17 -- added corrections near the top of the page, suggested by paul erlich
2003.03.13 -- added long quote from Margo Schulter at end (thanks to paul erlich)
2003.01.30 -- added graph comparing 1/4-comma meantone with Werckmeister III
2002.11.7 -- added table of approximations to JI chord identities
2002.10.25 -- added bingo-card lattice of typical 31-tone chain, and 31edo-degrees in interval list
2002.09.24 -- added historical comments, and math to show "mean tone" and "major 3rd" derivations
2001.11.05
2001.06.26
2000.08.10
by Joe Monzo
I welcome
feedback about this webpage:
|